Thursday, April 26, 2012

Is there any particular reason why science is not open to the possibilty of apes evolving from human

Apes are a stronger species than humans and are better built for surviving the environment. I wonder why no thinks that humans could have taken up a stooped posture, grown more hair, and lessened their cognitive reasoning skills as a survival trait for survival conditioning.



Is there any particular reason why science is not open to the possibilty of apes evolving from humans?

You mean how come Apes have better thumbs?



Is there any particular reason why science is not open to the possibilty of apes evolving from humans?

I suggest you read the science on this.



Is there any particular reason why science is not open to the possibilty of apes evolving from humans?

I think it's comparable to suggesting the 8-track evolved from iPods: The evidence doesn't match up.



Is there any particular reason why science is not open to the possibilty of apes evolving from humans?

Fossil record. Primitive apes are deeper in geological strata than early hominids.



Edit: They have not been found literally one on top of the other. This would be unlikely beside the fact they lived in different environments, but you can use relative dating.



You look at a column of sedimentary rock, the older stuff is on the bottom. In one area you have the layers, 1 2 3 4 5, all with clear divisions. Nearby you have 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11. Same pattern, but the first two layers are missing, probably eroded. A third area has 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13. This one goes deeper. You have an monkey fossil in layer 13, apes in both 7's, and human fossils are only found in layers 1. Which is older?



Not to mention you can also use radiometric dating to confirm this logical assumption.



Is there any particular reason why science is not open to the possibilty of apes evolving from humans?

Apes only have better thumbs for THEIR lifestyles. Science evidences the bible, not ANY kind of evolution.



Is there any particular reason why science is not open to the possibilty of apes evolving from humans?

ummmm...im a christian and i don't believe in what your saying.



i don't agree with evolution at all...but neither do i believe in de-evolution.



Is there any particular reason why science is not open to the possibilty of apes evolving from humans?

I don't see why not- after all, whales came from cows-and not the other way around.



EDIT: or so they say?



Is there any particular reason why science is not open to the possibilty of apes evolving from humans?

http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/;_ylt=AuvV7...



Is there any particular reason why science is not open to the possibilty of apes evolving from humans?

It's well known that apes score lower on SAT's.



Is there any particular reason why science is not open to the possibilty of apes evolving from humans?

It could happen in the future, hypothetically I guess. Fossil record suggests no though.



Is there any particular reason why science is not open to the possibilty of apes evolving from humans?

Occam's razor.



If you assume the common ancestor of humans and apes was a human, then the features that distinguish humans from apes had to be lost three times -- once in the orangutangs, once in the gorillas, and once in the chimpanzees. It's much more parsimonious to assume that they appeared only after humans split off from the rest of the apes.



Also, apes appear in the fossil record millions of years before humans do.



Is there any particular reason why science is not open to the possibilty of apes evolving from humans?

Humans are better equipped to survive the environment, because of our intelligence.



Apes are dumb, that's their downfall.



Love Jack



Is there any particular reason why science is not open to the possibilty of apes evolving from humans?

Evolution theory does NOT say that humans evolved from apes. It says apes and humans evolved from a common ancestor (read Darwin:Origin of Species) - that species we nickname "the missing link". Therefore your question doesn't really make much sense.



Is there any particular reason why science is not open to the possibilty of apes evolving from humans?

If this were true the evidence would be in ape and human genotypes - but its not there. In fact the opposite case - ancient ape to ancient human - is evidenced.



Is there any particular reason why science is not open to the possibilty of apes evolving from humans?

Humans *are* apes.



Modern apes and humans all evolved from a common ancestor: they are cousins of each other, not ancestors.



Fossil evidence of the existance of such common ancestor species demonstrates that it was around before either modern apes or humans.



And humans are better at surviving in their environment. If gorillas were better at surviving than humans, we wouldn't be driving them to extinction.



Is there any particular reason why science is not open to the possibilty of apes evolving from humans?

that's not where the evidence leads

No comments:

Post a Comment